NVIDIA GeForce MX250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce MX250  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M.

420
Place in performance rating
474
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
GP108B
Code name
GK106
Laptop
Type
Laptop
20 February 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
30 May 2013 (8 years ago)
$1165
Price now
$93
2.35
Value for money
0.53
N17S-G2
GPU code name
N14-GE
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce MX250  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

384
Pipelines
768
1518 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
1,800 million
Transistor count
2,540 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
24.91
Texture fill rate
55.23
no data
Floating-point performance
1,326 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
768
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
1582 MHz
Boost clock speed
863 MHz
1,800 million
Number of transistors
2,540 million
10 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x4
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
large
Laptop size
large
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
7000 MHz
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
48.06 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-
no data
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
HDMI
+
no data
VGA аnalog display support
Up to 2048x1536
no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
no data
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
no data
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
no data
HDCP content protection
+
no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Multi Monitor
no data
no data
3D Vision
+
+
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
no data
FXAA
+
no data
TXAA
+
no data
Verde Drivers
+
no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
no data
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
no data
Direct Compute
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 API
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX250

3.15% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (10 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

Multi Monitor

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Cheaper ($93 vs $1165)

More pipelines (768 vs 384)

More memory bandwidth (64.0 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce MX250 .

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 546 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 5 Hitesti Score