NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M  vs  AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

474
Place in performance rating
96
Kepler
Architecture
Vega
GK106
Code name
Vega 10
Laptop
Type
Workstation
30 May 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
14 December 2017 (3 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$399
$93
Price now
$4999 (12.5x MSRP)
0.53
Value for money
3.69
N14-GE
GPU code name
Vega
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M  vs  AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

768
Pipelines
3584
850 MHz
Core clock speed
1247 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2,540 million
Transistor count
12,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
210 Watt
55.23
Texture fill rate
280.0
1,326 gflops
Floating-point performance
9,677 gflops
768
CUDA cores
no data
768
Pipelines / CUDA cores
3584
863 MHz
Boost clock speed
1250 MHz
2,540 million
Number of transistors
12,500 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
210 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data
+
SLI options
no data
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

GDDR5
Memory type
HBM2
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
2000 MHz
Memory clock speed
786 MHz
64.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
402.4 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-
GDDR5
Standard memory configuration
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
+
HDMI
+
Up to 2048x1536
VGA аnalog display support
no data
Up to 3840x2160
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
no data
Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support
no data
Up to 1920x1200
LVDS signal support
no data
+
HDCP content protection
no data
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
no data
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
3D Vision
no data
+
GPU Boost
no data
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
no data
+
FXAA
no data
+
TXAA
no data
+
Verde Drivers
no data
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
no data
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
no data
+
Direct Compute
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 API
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M or AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Cheaper ($93 vs $4999 (12.5x MSRP))

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 210 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

47.85% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (3584 vs 768)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (402.4 GB/s vs 64.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M or AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 5 Hitesti Score
2.1 Out of 25 Hitesti Score