Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
GT218
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
GT218

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD  vs  GT218.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 4.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
no data
no data
Price now
$27
Montevina
GPU code name
GT218
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD  vs  GT218 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

533 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
no data
Number of transistors
260 million

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
1.2

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GT218 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or GT218 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GT218
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

2% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of GT218

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or GT218?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD versus GT218 performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.4 Out of 60 Hitesti Score
2.6 Out of 21 Hitesti Score