AMD Radeon E6465
VS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
AMD Radeon E6465
VS
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon E6465  vs  Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.

1012
Place in performance rating
not rated
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Gen. 4.5
29 September 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Caicos
GPU code name
Montevina
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon E6465  vs  Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

600 MHz
Core clock speed
533 MHz
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
4.800
Texture fill rate
no data
192.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
10
370 million
Number of transistors
no data
25 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon E6465 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon E6465 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
3200 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon E6465 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon E6465 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon E6465 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon E6465 or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon E6465
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon E6465
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon E6465
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon E6465
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon E6465
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon E6465

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

0.13% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Radeon E6465 or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD .

AMD Radeon E6465 versus Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
3.4 Out of 60 Hitesti Score