Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
GeForce2 MX
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
GeForce2 MX

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD  vs  GeForce2 MX.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 4.5
Architecture
Celsius
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
28 June 2000 (21 years ago)
no data
Price now
$70
Montevina
GPU code name
NV11 A2
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD  vs  GeForce2 MX in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

533 MHz
Core clock speed
175 MHz
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
180 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
0.7
10
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
no data
Number of transistors
20 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GeForce2 MX come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
AGP 4x
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs GeForce2 MX.

no data
Memory type
SDR
no data
Maximum RAM amount
32 MB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
166 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
2.656 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs GeForce2 MX.

no data
Display Connectors
1x VGA

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GeForce2 MX is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
7.0
no data
OpenGL
1.2
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and GeForce2 MX graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or GeForce2 MX good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GeForce2 MX
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GeForce2 MX
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GeForce2 MX
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GeForce2 MX
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
GeForce2 MX
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 180 nm)

Advantages of GeForce2 MX

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or GeForce2 MX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD versus GeForce2 MX performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.4 Out of 60 Hitesti Score
2.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score