Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
NVIDIA NVS 310
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
VS
NVIDIA NVS 310

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD  vs  NVIDIA NVS 310.

not rated
Place in performance rating
1002
Gen. 4.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
no data
Code name
GF119
no data
Type
Workstation
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
26 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$159
no data
Price now
$63 (0.4x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.03
Montevina
GPU code name
GF119
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD  vs  NVIDIA NVS 310 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
48
533 MHz
Core clock speed
523 MHz
no data
Transistor count
292 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
4.184
no data
Floating-point performance
100.4 gflops
10
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Number of transistors
292 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
20 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and NVIDIA NVS 310 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
156 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs NVIDIA NVS 310.

no data
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1750 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
14 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs NVIDIA NVS 310.

no data
Display Connectors
2x DisplayPort

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and NVIDIA NVS 310 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and NVIDIA NVS 310 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or NVIDIA NVS 310 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
NVIDIA NVS 310
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
NVIDIA NVS 310
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
NVIDIA NVS 310
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
NVIDIA NVS 310
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
NVIDIA NVS 310
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 310

0.06% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or NVIDIA NVS 310?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA NVS 310 .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD versus NVIDIA NVS 310 performance benchmarks comparison

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.4 Out of 60 Hitesti Score
4.2 Out of 6 Hitesti Score