General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro W6800 and Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro W6800 or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | ||||||
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | ||||||
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | ||||||
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | ||||||
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 | ||||||
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
71.01% faster in synthetic tests
Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 65 nm)
Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
So, AMD Radeon Pro W6800 or Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro W6800 .
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 versus Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD performance benchmarks comparison
Overall benchmark performance
Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
