Radeon 9200 SE
VS
Radeon X1650 AGP
Radeon 9200 SE
VS
Radeon X1650 AGP

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Radeon 9200 SE和Radeon X1650 AGP之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Rage 7
建筑学
R500
1 March 2003 (18 years ago)
发布日期
1 February 2007 (14 years ago)
$86
当前价格
$185
RV280
图形处理器的代码名称
RV530
Desktop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Radeon 9200 SE 与 Radeon X1650 AGP 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

200 MHz
核心时钟频率
500 MHz
150 nm
技术过程
90 nm
0.8
每秒处理的文本数
2.000
36 million
晶体管的数量
157 million
28 Watt
设计热量输出
没有数据

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡Radeon 9200 SE}和Radeon X1650 AGP}}}}}}的图形卡Radeon 9200 SE}。

AGP 8x
介面
AGP 8x
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. Radeon 9200 SE 和Radeon X1650 AGP 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

DDR
存储器类型
DDR2
64 MB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
332 MHz
存储器频率
800 MHz
2.656 GB/s
内存带宽
12.8 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡Radeon 9200 SE和Radeon X1650 AGP的图形卡Radeon 9200 SE。

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
与显示器的连接
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API 支持

两个对手 Radeon 9200 SE 和 Radeon X1650 AGP 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

8.1
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
1.4
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
没有数据
Shader Model
3.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Radeon 9200 SE 和 Radeon X1650 AGP 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Radeon 9200 SE 查明是否 Radeon X1650 AGP 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon X1650 AGP
Death Stranding (2020) Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon X1650 AGP
F1 2020 (2020) Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon X1650 AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon X1650 AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon X1650 AGP
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Radeon 9200 SE

2% 在测试中更快

更加便宜 ($86 vs $185)

优势 Radeon X1650 AGP

大的内存带宽 (90 nm vs 150 nm)

最大的RAM尺寸 (256 MB vs 64 MB)

大的内存带宽 (12.8 GB/s vs 2.656 GB/s)

So, Radeon 9200 SE or Radeon X1650 AGP?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 Radeon 9200 SE .

Radeon 9200 SE versus Radeon X1650 AGP 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

4.8 Out of 38 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score