NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M265
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M265

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M  vs  AMD Radeon R7 M265.

1019
Place in performance rating
803
14.24
Value for money (0-100)
no data
G7x
Architecture
GCN
G71
Code name
Topaz
Mobile workstation
Type
Laptop
29 September 2005 (16 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$99.99
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$126 (1.3x MSRP)
Price now
$585
0.02
Value for money
0.06
G71glm
GPU code name
Opal XT / Mars
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M  vs  AMD Radeon R7 M265 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

32
Pipelines
384
8 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
500 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
278 million
Transistor count
1,550 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
45 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
12.00
Texture fill rate
23.52
no data
Floating-point performance
633.6 gflops
no data
Compute units
6
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
500 MHz
Boost clock speed
825 MHz
278 million
Number of transistors
1,550 million
45 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-III
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
large
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M vs AMD Radeon R7 M265.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1200 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
38.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
32 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M vs AMD Radeon R7 M265.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
Zero Core
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M or AMD Radeon R7 M265 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

Cheaper ($126 (1.3x MSRP) vs $585)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (38.4 GB/s vs 32 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M265

2.76% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M or AMD Radeon R7 M265?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 M265 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M versus AMD Radeon R7 M265 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.0 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
3.5 Out of 13 Hitesti Score