GMA 900
VS
3D Rage II
GMA 900
VS
3D Rage II

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定GMA 900和3D Rage II之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Generation 3.0
建筑学
Mach
2005 (16 years ago)
发布日期
5 September 1996 (25 years ago)
没有数据
初始价格
$269
$147
当前价格
$117 (0.4x MSRP)
Alviso
图形处理器的代码名称
Mach64 GT-B
Desktop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,GMA 900 与 3D Rage II 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

333 MHz
核心时钟频率
60 MHz
130 nm
技术过程
500 nm
1.332
每秒处理的文本数
0.06
没有数据
晶体管的数量
5 million

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡GMA 900}和3D Rage II}}}}}}的图形卡GMA 900}。

FSB
介面
PCI

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. GMA 900 和3D Rage II 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

System Shared
存储器类型
SDR
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
4 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
83 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
664.0 MB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡GMA 900和3D Rage II的图形卡GMA 900。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x VGA

API 支持

两个对手 GMA 900 和 3D Rage II 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

9.0c
DirectX
5.0
1.4
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
没有数据
N/A
OpenCL
N/A

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 GMA 900 和 3D Rage II 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 GMA 900 查明是否 3D Rage II 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GMA 900
3D Rage II
Death Stranding (2020) GMA 900
3D Rage II
F1 2020 (2020) GMA 900
3D Rage II
Gears Tactics (2020) GMA 900
3D Rage II
Doom Eternal (2020) GMA 900
3D Rage II
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 GMA 900

大的内存带宽 (130 nm vs 500 nm)

优势 3D Rage II

更加便宜 ($117 (0.4x MSRP) vs $147)

So, GMA 900 or 3D Rage II?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 GMA 900 .

GMA 900 versus 3D Rage II 基准测试中的比较

用户评价

2.5 Out of 4 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score