NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
VS

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

129
Place in performance rating
205
56.48
Value for money (0-100)
33.84
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TU117
Code name
GK104
Desktop
Type
Desktop
23 April 2019
Release date
25 June 2013
$149
Launch price (MSRP)
$249
$159
Price now
$160

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

896
Pipelines
1152
1485 MHz
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
4,700 million
Transistor count
3,540 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
93.24
Texture fill rate
94.1 billion/sec
no data
Floating-point performance
2,378 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
97 °C
no data
CUDA cores
1152

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
229 mm
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
None
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
no data
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
no data
Minimum recommended system power
500 Watt

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
8000 MHz
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
128.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two video cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
no data
G-SYNC support
+
no data
Multi monitor support
4 displays
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA и AMD are using different technologies.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
GeForce Experience
+
no data
Blu Ray 3D
+
no data
3D Gaming
+
no data
3D Vision Live
+
no data
FXAA
+
no data
TXAA
+
no data
Adaptive VSync
+
no data
PhysX
+

API support

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 video cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 259.1 95.8 62.2 39.4 26 14.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 163 90.2 77.2 69.5 40.3 20.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

14.44% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($159 vs $160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (75 Watt vs 170 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

More pipelines (1152 vs 896)

More memory bandwidth (192.2 GB/s vs 128.0 GB/s)

G-SYNC support

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Multi-platform Ice Storm test shows the videocard performance by using the off-screen rendering method. Standard testing conditions are 1280*720 (720p).

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Unigine Heaven 4.0 features accurate results and extreme stability testing. It is based on UNIGINE 1 platform.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Unlike Ice Storm, Cloud Gate test elaborated by 3DMark employs more resource-intensive scenes. The better the final estimation, the faster your videocard is. The processing is carried out by means of DirectX 10.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

This is an advanced videocard benchmark. With DirectX 11 being used for conducting the processing, the normal testing time is 15 minutes. The higher the estimation, the faster the videocard is.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Complex graphic scenes require all the videocard’s resources. They use the entire RAM and computing power. The test’s results can be viewed below.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

3DMark Vantage Performance

This Direct X10-based benchmark contains AI tests, physics, and 6 computing tests.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This test works for all types of videocards, has an innovative cross-platform core, and supports Direct X 9/10/11 and OpenGL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This test provides the best estimation of graphic processor performance. It procures highly accurate results.

Passmark

PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the videocard’s performance.

User rating

4.2 Out of 971 Hitesti Score
4.3 Out of 150 Hitesti Score