GMA X4500
VS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GMA X4500
VS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GMA X4500  vs  GeForce 210 Rev. 2.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
1 June 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
12 October 2009 (12 years ago)
$97
Price now
$52
Eaglelake
GPU code name
GT218
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GMA X4500  vs  GeForce 210 Rev. 2 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

533 MHz
Core clock speed
520 MHz
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
2.132
Texture fill rate
4.160
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
no data
Number of transistors
260 million
13 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
31 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GMA X4500 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GMA X4500 vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2.

System Shared
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
6.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GMA X4500 vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
1.2

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GMA X4500 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

10.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
N/A
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GMA X4500 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GMA X4500 or GeForce 210 Rev. 2 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GMA X4500
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
Death Stranding (2020) GMA X4500
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
F1 2020 (2020) GMA X4500
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
Gears Tactics (2020) GMA X4500
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
Doom Eternal (2020) GMA X4500
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GMA X4500

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of GeForce 210 Rev. 2

Cheaper ($52 vs $97)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

So, GMA X4500 or GeForce 210 Rev. 2?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend GMA X4500 .

GMA X4500 versus GeForce 210 Rev. 2 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

3.4 Out of 67 Hitesti Score
2.1 Out of 28 Hitesti Score