GeForce2 MX 200
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce2 MX 200
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GeForce2 MX 200  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

not rated
Place in performance rating
265
no data
Value for money (0-100)
33.84
Celsius
Architecture
Kepler
no data
Code name
GK104
no data
Type
Desktop
3 March 2001 (20 years ago)
Release date
25 June 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$249
$27
Price now
$141 (0.6x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
14.45
NV11 B2
GPU code name
GK104
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GeForce2 MX 200  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
1152
175 MHz
Core clock speed
980 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
no data
Transistor count
3,540 million
180 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
0.7
Texture fill rate
94.1 billion/sec
no data
Floating-point performance
2,378 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
97 °C
no data
CUDA cores
1152
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1152
no data
Boost clock speed
1033 MHz
20 million
Number of transistors
3,540 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
170 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GeForce2 MX 200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

AGP 4x
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
None
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
no data
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
no data
Minimum recommended system power
500 Watt

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GeForce2 MX 200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

SDR
Memory type
GDDR5
32 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
166 MHz
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
1.328 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GeForce2 MX 200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
no data
G-SYNC support
+
no data
Multi monitor support
4 displays
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
GeForce Experience
+
no data
Blu Ray 3D
+
no data
3D Gaming
+
no data
3D Vision Live
+
no data
FXAA
+
no data
TXAA
+
no data
Adaptive VSync
+
no data
PhysX
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GeForce2 MX 200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

7.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
1.2
OpenGL
4.3
N/A
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
N/A
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GeForce2 MX 200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GeForce2 MX 200 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GeForce2 MX 200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Death Stranding (2020) GeForce2 MX 200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
F1 2020 (2020) GeForce2 MX 200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Gears Tactics (2020) GeForce2 MX 200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Doom Eternal (2020) GeForce2 MX 200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GeForce2 MX 200

Cheaper ($27 vs $141 (0.6x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (32 MB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

22.93% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 180 nm)

More memory bandwidth (192.2 GB/s vs 1.328 GB/s)

G-SYNC support

So, GeForce2 MX 200 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 .

GeForce2 MX 200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 4.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.8 Out of 6 Hitesti Score
4.3 Out of 160 Hitesti Score