AMD FirePro W600
VS
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
AMD FirePro W600
VS
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD FirePro W600  vs  Matrox M9125 PCIe x16.

503
Place in performance rating
not rated
3.75
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.0
Architecture
PX
Cape Verde
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
13 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
no data
$599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$399 (0.7x MSRP)
Price now
$27
0.85
Value for money
no data
Cape Verde
GPU code name
PX-A1
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD FirePro W600  vs  Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

512
Pipelines
no data
750 MHz
Core clock speed
250 MHz
1,500 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
90 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
24.00
Texture fill rate
2.000
768.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
512
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1,500 million
Number of transistors
no data
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD FirePro W600 and Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
163 mm
Length
168 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD FirePro W600 vs Matrox M9125 PCIe x16.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR2
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
4000 MHz
Memory clock speed
600 MBps
64 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
4.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD FirePro W600 vs Matrox M9125 PCIe x16.

6x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 2x LFH60

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD FirePro W600 and Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_1)
DirectX
no data
4.6
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W600 and Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W600 or Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W600
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W600
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W600
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W600
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W600
Matrox M9125 PCIe x16
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W600

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 4.8 GB/s)

Advantages of Matrox M9125 PCIe x16

17.01% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($27 vs $399 (0.7x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 2 GB)

So, AMD FirePro W600 or Matrox M9125 PCIe x16?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 .

AMD FirePro W600 versus Matrox M9125 PCIe x16 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

2.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score