NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GRID K260Q和NVIDIA Quadro 400之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

379
业绩排名中的位置
1064
没有数据
物有所值
4.94
Kepler
建筑学
Tesla 2.0
GK104
代码名称
GT216
Workstation
类型
Workstation
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
发布日期
5 April 2011 (10 years ago)
$937
初始价格
$169
没有数据
当前价格
$510 (3x MSRP)
GK104
图形处理器的代码名称
GT216
Workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GRID K260Q 与 NVIDIA Quadro 400 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1536
输送机
48
745 MHz
核心时钟频率
450 MHz
3,540 million
晶体管的数量
486 million
28 nm
技术过程
40 nm
225 Watt
消耗功率
32 Watt
95.36
每秒处理的文本数
7.200
2,289 gflops
浮点运算
108 gflops
1536
转换器/CUDA核心
48
3,540 million
晶体管的数量
486 million
225 Watt
设计热量输出
32 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q}和NVIDIA Quadro 400}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 2.0 x16
没有数据
长度
163 mm
没有数据
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和NVIDIA Quadro 400 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
DDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
256 Bit
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
5000 MHz
存储器频率
1540 MHz
160.0 GB/s
内存带宽
12.32 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q和NVIDIA Quadro 400的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和 NVIDIA Quadro 400 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和 NVIDIA Quadro 400 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 查明是否 NVIDIA Quadro 400 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GRID K260Q

12.81% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (1536 vs 48)

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 40 nm)

大的内存带宽 (160.0 GB/s vs 12.32 GB/s)

优势 NVIDIA Quadro 400

更少的电力消耗 (32 Watt vs 225 Watt)

最大的RAM尺寸 (512 MB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA GRID K260Q or NVIDIA Quadro 400?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GRID K260Q .

NVIDIA GRID K260Q versus NVIDIA Quadro 400 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score