VS
一般信息
显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据，以确定18800-1和3D Rage之间的胜负。请注意，比较是全面的，下面是来自合成基准的排名，定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。
not rated
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
Wonder
建筑学
Mach
no data
发布日期
1 April 1996 (25 years ago)
没有数据
当前价格
$9.95
18800-1
图形处理器的代码名称
Mach64 GT
Desktop
市场部分
Desktop
技术数据
在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面，18800-1 与 3D Rage 相比，哪个显卡更好，是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
没有数据
核心时钟频率
44 MHz
800 nm
技术过程
500 nm
没有数据
每秒处理的文本数
0.04
没有数据
晶体管的数量
5 million
尺寸、连接器和兼容性
让我们讨论图形卡18800-1}和3D Rage}}}}}}的图形卡18800-1}。
没有数据
介面
PCI
内存（频率和超频）
显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高（GDDR）越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. 18800-1 和3D Rage 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:
没有数据
存储器类型
EDO
没有数据
Maximum RAM amount
2 MB
没有数据
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
没有数据
存储器频率
57 MHz
没有数据
内存带宽
456.0 MB/s
支持端口和显示器
让我们讨论图形卡18800-1和3D Rage的图形卡18800-1。
没有数据
与显示器的连接
1x VGA
API 支持
两个对手 18800-1 和 3D Rage 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持（API）对整体性能影响不大，它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。
N/A
DirectX
5.0
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
游戏中的表现
选择列表以识别 18800-1 和 3D Rage 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率（从低到4K）用于测试。 找出是 18800-1 查明是否 3D Rage 适合游戏的
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 18800-1 | ||||||
| 3D Rage | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | 18800-1 | ||||||
| 3D Rage | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | 18800-1 | ||||||
| 3D Rage | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 18800-1 | ||||||
| 3D Rage | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 18800-1 | ||||||
| 3D Rage | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
优势 18800-1
There is no accountable advantage
优势 3D Rage
大的内存带宽 (500 nm vs 800 nm)
So, 18800-1 or 3D Rage?
根据合成和游戏测试的结果，我们建议 18800-1 .
18800-1 versus 3D Rage 基准测试中的比较
用户评价
5.0
Out of 2
Hitesti Score
1.0
Out of 1
Hitesti Score
