NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VS
AMD Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VS
AMD Radeon R9 285

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q  vs  AMD Radeon R9 285.

201
Place in performance rating
208
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.05
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TU117
Code name
Tonga
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
2 September 2014 (7 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$249
no data
Price now
$385 (1.5x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
13.04
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
GPU code name
Tonga
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q  vs  AMD Radeon R9 285 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1024
Pipelines
1792
930 / 1200 MHz
Core clock speed
918 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
4,700 million
Transistor count
5,000 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
190 Watt
103.7
Texture fill rate
102.8
no data
Floating-point performance
3,290 gflops
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
1500 / 1620 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
5,000 million
40 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
190 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 285 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
221 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 285.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
8000 MHz
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
128.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
176.0 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 285.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 285 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 285 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q or AMD Radeon R9 285 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon R9 285
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
AMD Radeon R9 285
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q 182 96 78 55
AMD Radeon R9 285
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q 263.3 77.5 47.6 35.1
AMD Radeon R9 285
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q 147.4 85.5 58.1
AMD Radeon R9 285
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

25.89% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (40 Watt vs 190 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285

More pipelines (1792 vs 1024)

More memory bandwidth (176.0 GB/s vs 128.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q or AMD Radeon R9 285?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q .

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon R9 285 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Medical: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Medical test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Maya: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Maya test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Energy: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Energy test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Creo: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Creo test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - Catia: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - Catia test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

Benchmark SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max: Graphic cards performance test result. Check SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 8 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score