AMD Radeon R9 285
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R9 285
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R9 285  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3.

208
Place in performance rating
1673
0.05
Value for money (0-100)
0.10
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tonga
Code name
GT218
Desktop
Type
Desktop
2 September 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
13 June 2012
$249
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$385 (1.5x MSRP)
Price now
$284
13.04
Value for money
no data
Tonga
GPU code name
no data
Desktop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R9 285  vs  NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1792
Pipelines
16
918 MHz
Core clock speed
589 MHz
5,000 million
Transistor count
260 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
190 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
102.8
Texture fill rate
4.712
3,290 gflops
Floating-point performance
44.86 gflops
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
5,000 million
Number of transistors
no data
190 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
221 mm
Length
168 mm
2x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR2
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
5500 MHz
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
176.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
9.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
+
HDMI
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 285 or NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 285
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285

More pipelines (1792 vs 16)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (176.0 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

0.04% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($284 vs $385 (1.5x MSRP))

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 190 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (128 MB vs 2 GB)

So, AMD Radeon R9 285 or NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 .

AMD Radeon R9 285 versus NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score