NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
VS
3D Rage IIC AGP
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
VS
3D Rage IIC AGP

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800  vs  3D Rage IIC AGP.

660
Place in performance rating
not rated
7.72
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Rage 2
GT200B
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
no data
11 November 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
1 September 1996 (25 years ago)
$1,799
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$140 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$38
0.69
Value for money
no data
GT200B
GPU code name
Rage 2
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800  vs  3D Rage IIC AGP in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

192
Pipelines
no data
602 MHz
Core clock speed
60 MHz
1,400 million
Transistor count
no data
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
500 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
38.53
Texture fill rate
0.06
462.3 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1,400 million
Number of transistors
5 million
150 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 and 3D Rage IIC AGP come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
AGP 2x
267 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs 3D Rage IIC AGP.

GDDR3
Memory type
SDR
1536 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 MB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1600 MHz
Memory clock speed
83 MHz
76.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
664.0 MB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs 3D Rage IIC AGP.

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x VGA

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 and 3D Rage IIC AGP is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
5.0
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 and 3D Rage IIC AGP graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 or 3D Rage IIC AGP good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
3D Rage IIC AGP
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
3D Rage IIC AGP
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
3D Rage IIC AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
3D Rage IIC AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
3D Rage IIC AGP
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

5.35% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (55 nm vs 500 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 4 MB)

Advantages of 3D Rage IIC AGP

Cheaper ($38 vs $140 (0.1x MSRP))

More memory bandwidth (664.0 MB/s vs 76.8 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 or 3D Rage IIC AGP?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 versus 3D Rage IIC AGP performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.6 Out of 11 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score