GeForce GTS 240 OEM
VS
3D Rage IIC AGP
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
VS
3D Rage IIC AGP

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GeForce GTS 240 OEM  vs  3D Rage IIC AGP.

not rated
Place in performance rating
not rated
Tesla
Architecture
Rage 2
1 July 2009 (12 years ago)
Release date
1 September 1996 (25 years ago)
$388
Price now
$38
G92B
GPU code name
Rage 2
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GeForce GTS 240 OEM  vs  3D Rage IIC AGP in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

675 MHz
Core clock speed
60 MHz
55 nm
Manufacturing process technology
500 nm
37.80
Texture fill rate
0.06
362.9 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
112
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
754 million
Number of transistors
5 million
120 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 3D Rage IIC AGP come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
AGP 2x
229 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs 3D Rage IIC AGP.

GDDR3
Memory type
SDR
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
2200 MHz
Memory clock speed
83 MHz
70.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
664.0 MB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs 3D Rage IIC AGP.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x VGA

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

1.1
CUDA
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 3D Rage IIC AGP is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
5.0
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 3D Rage IIC AGP graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GeForce GTS 240 OEM or 3D Rage IIC AGP good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GeForce GTS 240 OEM
3D Rage IIC AGP
Death Stranding (2020) GeForce GTS 240 OEM
3D Rage IIC AGP
F1 2020 (2020) GeForce GTS 240 OEM
3D Rage IIC AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) GeForce GTS 240 OEM
3D Rage IIC AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) GeForce GTS 240 OEM
3D Rage IIC AGP
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GeForce GTS 240 OEM

Finer manufacturing process technology (55 nm vs 500 nm)

Advantages of 3D Rage IIC AGP

Cheaper ($38 vs $388)

More maximum RAM amount (4 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (664.0 MB/s vs 70.4 GB/s)

So, GeForce GTS 240 OEM or 3D Rage IIC AGP?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend GeForce GTS 240 OEM .

GeForce GTS 240 OEM versus 3D Rage IIC AGP performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

1.4 Out of 9 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score