NVIDIA GeForce 800A
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIA GeForce 800A
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 800A  vs  ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

902
Place in performance rating
2190
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.18
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GF119
Code name
RV620
Desktop
Type
Workstation
17 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
1 January 2009
no data
Price now
$148
GF119
GPU code name
no data
Desktop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 800A  vs  ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

48
Pipelines
40
475 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
181 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
3.800
Texture fill rate
1.600
141.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
96 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
292 million
Number of transistors
no data
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 800A and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
170 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 800A vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 800A vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x VHDCI

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 800A and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 800A and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 800A or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 800A
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 800A
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 800A
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 800A
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 800A
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 800A

1.87% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (48 vs 40)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 32 Watt)

Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 800A or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 800A .

NVIDIA GeForce 800A versus ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score