NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
VS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS  vs  ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

926
Place in performance rating
2190
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.18
G9x
Architecture
TeraScale
G94
Code name
RV620
Laptop
Type
Workstation
15 July 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
1 January 2009
$230
Price now
$148
0.03
Value for money
no data
NB9E-GT
GPU code name
no data
Laptop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS  vs  ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

64
Pipelines
40
600 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
505 million
Transistor count
181 million
55 / 65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
19.20
Texture fill rate
1.600
192 gflops
Floating-point performance
96 gflops
64
CUDA cores
no data
240
Gigaflops
no data
64
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
505 million
Number of transistors
no data
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
170 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
51.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x VHDCI

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
CUDA
no data
+
HybridPower
no data
+
PureVideo HD
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS

1.58% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (64 vs 40)

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

Advantages of ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Cheaper ($148 vs $230)

Less power consumption (32 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS or ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS .

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS versus ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score