ATI FirePro V3800
VS
AMD Cedar
ATI FirePro V3800
VS
AMD Cedar

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between ATI FirePro V3800  vs  AMD Cedar.

2280
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.27
Value for money (0-100)
no data
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Redwood
Code name
Cedar
Workstation
Type
Desktop
26 April 2010
Release date
no data
$129
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$102
Price now
$17.81
no data
GPU code name
Cedar
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between ATI FirePro V3800  vs  AMD Cedar in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

400
Pipelines
80
650 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
627 million
Transistor count
292 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
43 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
13.00
Texture fill rate
no data
520.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
80
no data
Number of transistors
292 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards ATI FirePro V3800 and AMD Cedar come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
no data
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Cedar.

DDR3
Memory type
no data
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
64 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Cedar.

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders ATI FirePro V3800 and AMD Cedar is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FirePro V3800 and AMD Cedar graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FirePro V3800 or AMD Cedar good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI FirePro V3800
AMD Cedar
Death Stranding (2020) ATI FirePro V3800
AMD Cedar
F1 2020 (2020) ATI FirePro V3800
AMD Cedar
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI FirePro V3800
AMD Cedar
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI FirePro V3800
AMD Cedar
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of ATI FirePro V3800

1.11% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (400 vs 80)

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $102)

So, ATI FirePro V3800 or AMD Cedar?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI FirePro V3800 .

ATI FirePro V3800 versus AMD Cedar performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

3.6 Out of 7 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score