AMD Radeon R7 240
VS
AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R7 240
VS
AMD Cedar

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R7 240  vs  AMD Cedar.

699
Place in performance rating
not rated
13.47
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Oland
Code name
Cedar
Desktop
Type
Desktop
8 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
no data
$69
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$261 (3.8x MSRP)
Price now
$17.81
reference
Design
no data
0.22
Value for money
no data
Oland
GPU code name
Cedar
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R7 240  vs  AMD Cedar in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

320
Pipelines
80
780 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
950 million
Transistor count
292 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
50 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
14.00
Texture fill rate
no data
499.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
320
Pipelines / CUDA cores
80
780 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
292 million
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Cedar come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
no data
168 mm
Length
no data
N/A
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Cedar.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1150 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Cedar.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
no data
+
HDMI
no data
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
-
HD3D
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Cedar is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX® 12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Cedar graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 240 or AMD Cedar good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Cedar
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Cedar
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Cedar
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Cedar
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Cedar
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240

4.82% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (320 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $261 (3.8x MSRP))

So, AMD Radeon R7 240 or AMD Cedar?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 240 .

AMD Radeon R7 240 versus AMD Cedar performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 84 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score