AMD Radeon Sky 500
VS
GRID K200
AMD Radeon Sky 500
VS
GRID K200

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Sky 500  vs  GRID K200.

266
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
Pitcairn
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
no data
27 March 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$235
$129
Price now
no data
15.67
Value for money
no data
Pitcairn
GPU code name
GK104
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Sky 500  vs  GRID K200 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1280
Pipelines
no data
950 MHz
Core clock speed
745 MHz
2,800 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
76.00
Texture fill rate
95.36
2,432 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1280
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
2,800 million
Number of transistors
3,540 million
150 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Sky 500 and GRID K200 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
242 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data
full height / full length
Form factor
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs GRID K200.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
4800 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
154 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Sky 500 vs GRID K200.

1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
1
Dual-link DVI support
no data
1
DisplayPort count
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
CUDA
3.0

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Sky 500 and GRID K200 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Sky 500 and GRID K200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Sky 500 or GRID K200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Sky 500
GRID K200
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Sky 500
GRID K200
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Sky 500
GRID K200
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Sky 500
GRID K200
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Sky 500
GRID K200
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Sky 500

23.64% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of GRID K200

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs 154 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon Sky 500 or GRID K200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Sky 500 .

AMD Radeon Sky 500 versus GRID K200 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score