AMD Radeon R9 290X
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680
AMD Radeon R9 290X
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R9 290X  vs  Qualcomm Adreno 680.

191
Place in performance rating
686
13.90
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN
Architecture
no data
Hawaii
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
Laptop
24 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
$549
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$24 (0x MSRP)
Price now
no data
reference
Design
no data
35.36
Value for money
no data
Hawaii XT
GPU code name
no data
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R9 290X  vs  Qualcomm Adreno 680 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

2816
Pipelines
no data
947 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
6,200 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
250 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
176.0
Texture fill rate
no data
5,632 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
2816
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
947 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
6,200 million
Number of transistors
no data
250 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R9 290X and Qualcomm Adreno 680 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
275 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Qualcomm Adreno 680.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
512 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1250 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
320 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Qualcomm Adreno 680.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data
+
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
+
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R9 290X and Qualcomm Adreno 680 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX® 12
DirectX
DirectX 12
4.6
OpenGL
no data
+
Vulkan
no data
6.3
Shader Model
no data
2.0
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 290X and Qualcomm Adreno 680 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 290X or Qualcomm Adreno 680 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Qualcomm Adreno 680
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X

31.19% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 680

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 28 nm)

So, AMD Radeon R9 290X or Qualcomm Adreno 680?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 290X .

AMD Radeon R9 290X versus Qualcomm Adreno 680 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Ice Storm GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Ice Storm GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

332042 (100 %)

Unigine Heaven 4.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 4.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 4.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.9 Out of 58 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 8 Hitesti Score