AMD FirePro W9100
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680
AMD FirePro W9100
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD FirePro W9100  vs  Qualcomm Adreno 680.

179
Place in performance rating
686
4.11
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 2.0
Architecture
no data
Hawaii
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
Laptop
26 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
$1694
Price now
no data
4.51
Value for money
no data
Hawaii
GPU code name
no data
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD FirePro W9100  vs  Qualcomm Adreno 680 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

2816
Pipelines
no data
930 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
6,200 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
750 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
163.7
Texture fill rate
no data
5,238 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
2816
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
6,200 million
Number of transistors
no data
750 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
275 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data
full height / full length
Form factor
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD FirePro W9100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
16 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
512 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
320 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD FirePro W9100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680.

6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
no data
1
StereoOutput3D
no data
1
Dual-link DVI support
no data
1
HD сomponent video output
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12
4.6
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W9100 or Qualcomm Adreno 680 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W9100

32.7% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 680

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 28 nm)

So, AMD FirePro W9100 or Qualcomm Adreno 680?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W9100 .

AMD FirePro W9100 versus Qualcomm Adreno 680 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 8 Hitesti Score