AMD Radeon Pro W6600
VS
Iris Plus Graphics 950
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
VS
Iris Plus Graphics 950

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon Pro W6600  vs  Iris Plus Graphics 950.

76
Place in performance rating
not rated
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Generation 11.0
8 June 2021 (less than a year ago)
Release date
no data
$649
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$951 (1.5x MSRP)
Price now
no data
34.64
Value for money
no data
Navi 23
GPU code name
Ice Lake GT2
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon Pro W6600  vs  Iris Plus Graphics 950 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
400 MHz
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
325.1
Texture fill rate
32.00
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
2903 MHz
Boost clock speed
1000 MHz
11,060 million
Number of transistors
no data
100 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
241 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950.

GDDR6
Memory type
System Shared
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
14 GB/s
Memory clock speed
no data
224.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs Iris Plus Graphics 950.

4x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and Iris Plus Graphics 950 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600 or Iris Plus Graphics 950 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Iris Plus Graphics 950
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6600

52.99% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 10 nm)

Advantages of Iris Plus Graphics 950

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon Pro W6600 or Iris Plus Graphics 950?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon Pro W6600 .

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 versus Iris Plus Graphics 950 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.2 Out of 11 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 12 Hitesti Score