Radeon E9260 MXM
VS
NVIDIA T400
Radeon E9260 MXM
VS
NVIDIA T400

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Radeon E9260 MXM和NVIDIA T400之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
340
GCN 4.0
建筑学
Turing
27 September 2016 (5 years ago)
发布日期
6 May 2021 (less than a year ago)
没有数据
当前价格
$24
没有数据
物有所值
2.45
Baffin
图形处理器的代码名称
TU117
Desktop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Radeon E9260 MXM 与 NVIDIA T400 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1090 MHz
核心时钟频率
没有数据
14 nm
技术过程
12 nm
57.60
每秒处理的文本数
34.20
2,150 gflops
浮点运算
没有数据
896
转换器/CUDA核心
384
1200 MHz
加速速度
1425 MHz
3,000 million
晶体管的数量
4,700 million
50 Watt
设计热量输出
30 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM}和NVIDIA T400}}}}}}的图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM}。

MXM-A (3.0)
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
None
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. Radeon E9260 MXM 和NVIDIA T400 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR6
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
7000 MHz
存储器频率
10 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
内存带宽
80 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM和NVIDIA T400的图形卡Radeon E9260 MXM。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
3x mini-DisplayPort

API 支持

两个对手 Radeon E9260 MXM 和 NVIDIA T400 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_0)
DirectX
没有数据
4.6
OpenGL
没有数据
1.2.131
Vulkan
没有数据
6.4
Shader Model
没有数据
2.0
OpenCL
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Radeon E9260 MXM 和 NVIDIA T400 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Radeon E9260 MXM 查明是否 NVIDIA T400 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA T400
Death Stranding (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA T400
F1 2020 (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA T400
Gears Tactics (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA T400
Doom Eternal (2020) Radeon E9260 MXM
NVIDIA T400
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Radeon E9260 MXM

最大的RAM尺寸 (4 GB vs 2 GB)

大的内存带宽 (112.0 GB/s vs 80 GB/s)

优势 NVIDIA T400

13.93% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (12 nm vs 14 nm)

So, Radeon E9260 MXM or NVIDIA T400?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA T400 .

Radeon E9260 MXM versus NVIDIA T400 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

3448 (100 %)

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.0 Out of 34 Hitesti Score