NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
VS
AMD FirePro S10000
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
VS
AMD FirePro S10000

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q和AMD FirePro S10000之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

285
业绩排名中的位置
247
Maxwell 2.0
建筑学
GCN 1.0
GM204
代码名称
Tahiti
Workstation
类型
Workstation
30 August 2015 (6 years ago)
发布日期
12 November 2012 (9 years ago)
没有数据
初始价格
$3,599
没有数据
当前价格
$699 (0.2x MSRP)
没有数据
物有所值
4.56
GM204
图形处理器的代码名称
Tahiti
Workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 与 AMD FirePro S10000 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

2048
输送机
4096
557 MHz
核心时钟频率
825 MHz
1178 MHz
加速
950 MHz
5,200 million
晶体管的数量
4,313 million
28 nm
技术过程
28 nm
225 Watt
消耗功率
750 Watt
150.8
每秒处理的文本数
106.4
4,833 gflops
浮点运算
2x 3,405 gflops
2048
转换器/CUDA核心
4096
1178 MHz
加速速度
950 MHz
5,200 million
晶体管的数量
4,313 million
225 Watt
设计热量输出
750 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q}和AMD FirePro S10000}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
长度
305 mm
1x 8-pin
补充喂养
2x 8-pin
没有数据
巴士支持
PCIe 3.0
没有数据
Form factor
full height / full length

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 和AMD FirePro S10000 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
256 Bit
存储器总线容量
384 Bit
5012 MHz
存储器频率
5000 MHz
160.4 GB/s
内存带宽
480 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q和AMD FirePro S10000的图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort
没有数据
Dual-link DVI support
1

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 和 AMD FirePro S10000 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 和 AMD FirePro S10000 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 查明是否 AMD FirePro S10000 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
AMD FirePro S10000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
AMD FirePro S10000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
AMD FirePro S10000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
AMD FirePro S10000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
AMD FirePro S10000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q

0.26% 在测试中更快

更少的电力消耗 (225 Watt vs 750 Watt)

优势 AMD FirePro S10000

更多输送机 (4096 vs 2048)

最大的RAM尺寸 (6 GB vs 2 GB)

大的内存带宽 (480 GB/s vs 160.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q or AMD FirePro S10000?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q .

NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q versus AMD FirePro S10000 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score