NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P2000

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q和NVIDIA Quadro P2000之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

285
业绩排名中的位置
194
没有数据
物有所值
19.51
Maxwell 2.0
建筑学
Pascal
GM204
代码名称
GP106
Workstation
类型
Workstation
30 August 2015 (6 years ago)
发布日期
6 February 2017 (4 years ago)
没有数据
初始价格
$585
没有数据
当前价格
$1307 (2.2x MSRP)
没有数据
物有所值
9.17
GM204
图形处理器的代码名称
GP106
Workstation
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 与 NVIDIA Quadro P2000 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

2048
输送机
1024
557 MHz
核心时钟频率
1076 MHz
1178 MHz
加速
1480 MHz
5,200 million
晶体管的数量
4,400 million
28 nm
技术过程
16 nm
225 Watt
消耗功率
75 Watt
150.8
每秒处理的文本数
94.72
4,833 gflops
浮点运算
3,031 gflops
2048
转换器/CUDA核心
1024
1178 MHz
加速速度
1480 MHz
5,200 million
晶体管的数量
4,400 million
225 Watt
设计热量输出
75 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q}和NVIDIA Quadro P2000}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
长度
201 mm
1x 8-pin
补充喂养
None

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 和NVIDIA Quadro P2000 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
5 GB
256 Bit
存储器总线容量
160 Bit
5012 MHz
存储器频率
7008 MHz
160.4 GB/s
内存带宽
140.2 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q和NVIDIA Quadro P2000的图形卡NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
4x DisplayPort

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 和 NVIDIA Quadro P2000 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
没有数据
Vulkan
+

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 和 NVIDIA Quadro P2000 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q 查明是否 NVIDIA Quadro P2000 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q

更多输送机 (2048 vs 1024)

大的内存带宽 (160.4 GB/s vs 140.2 GB/s)

优势 NVIDIA Quadro P2000

9.16% 在测试中更快

大的内存带宽 (16 nm vs 28 nm)

更少的电力消耗 (75 Watt vs 225 Watt)

最大的RAM尺寸 (5 GB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q or NVIDIA Quadro P2000?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA Quadro P2000 .

NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q versus NVIDIA Quadro P2000 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

基准3DMark冰风暴GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Ice Storm GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

基准3DMark Cloud Gate GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Cloud Gate GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Fire Strike Score

基准3DMark Fire Strike得分。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Fire Strike Score测试结果。

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

基准3DMark Fire Strike图形。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark Fire Strike Graphics的GPU测试结果。

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

基准3DMark 11性能GPU。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看3DMark 11 Performance GPU的测试结果。

3DMark Vantage Performance

基准3DMark Vantage性能。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Vantage性能测试结果。

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.9 Out of 40 Hitesti Score