NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
Intel HD Graphics 2000
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
Intel HD Graphics 2000

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GRID K260Q和Intel HD Graphics 2000之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

379
业绩排名中的位置
1000
Kepler
建筑学
Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge
GK104
代码名称
Sandy Bridge GT1
Workstation
类型
Laptop
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
发布日期
1 February 2011 (10 years ago)
$937
初始价格
没有数据
没有数据
当前价格
$318
没有数据
物有所值
0.01
GK104
图形处理器的代码名称
Sandy Bridge
Workstation
市场部分
Laptop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GRID K260Q 与 Intel HD Graphics 2000 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1536
输送机
48
745 MHz
核心时钟频率
850/1100 MHz
没有数据
加速
1350 MHz
3,540 million
晶体管的数量
189 million
28 nm
技术过程
32 nm
225 Watt
消耗功率
没有数据
95.36
每秒处理的文本数
8.100
2,289 gflops
浮点运算
10.2 gflops
1536
转换器/CUDA核心
6
没有数据
加速速度
1350 MHz
3,540 million
晶体管的数量
189 million
225 Watt
设计热量输出
没有数据

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q}和Intel HD Graphics 2000}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
PCIe 1.0 x16

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和Intel HD Graphics 2000 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
System Shared
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
没有数据
256 Bit
存储器总线容量
64/128 Bit
5000 MHz
存储器频率
没有数据
160.0 GB/s
内存带宽
没有数据
没有数据
共享内存
+

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q和Intel HD Graphics 2000的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和 Intel HD Graphics 2000 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.1

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和 Intel HD Graphics 2000 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 查明是否 Intel HD Graphics 2000 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Intel HD Graphics 2000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Intel HD Graphics 2000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GRID K260Q

12.61% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (1536 vs 48)

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 32 nm)

优势 Intel HD Graphics 2000

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA GRID K260Q or Intel HD Graphics 2000?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GRID K260Q .

NVIDIA GRID K260Q versus Intel HD Graphics 2000 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

3DMark Vantage Performance

基准3DMark Vantage性能。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的3DMark Vantage性能测试结果。

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.1 Out of 77 Hitesti Score