NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
AMD Radeon E6760
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
AMD Radeon E6760

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GRID K260Q和AMD Radeon E6760之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

379
业绩排名中的位置
658
没有数据
物有所值
4.64
Kepler
建筑学
TeraScale 2
GK104
代码名称
Turks
Workstation
类型
Desktop
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
发布日期
2 May 2011 (10 years ago)
$937
初始价格
$239.99
没有数据
当前价格
$140 (0.6x MSRP)
没有数据
物有所值
0.54
GK104
图形处理器的代码名称
Turks
Workstation
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GRID K260Q 与 AMD Radeon E6760 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

1536
输送机
480
745 MHz
核心时钟频率
600 MHz
3,540 million
晶体管的数量
716 million
28 nm
技术过程
40 nm
225 Watt
消耗功率
45 Watt
95.36
每秒处理的文本数
14.40
2,289 gflops
浮点运算
576.0 gflops
1536
转换器/CUDA核心
480
3,540 million
晶体管的数量
716 million
225 Watt
设计热量输出
45 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q}和AMD Radeon E6760}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q}。

PCIe 3.0 x16
介面
MXM-A (3.0)

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和AMD Radeon E6760 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

GDDR5
存储器类型
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
存储器总线容量
128 Bit
5000 MHz
存储器频率
3200 MHz
160.0 GB/s
内存带宽
51.2 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q和AMD Radeon E6760的图形卡NVIDIA GRID K260Q。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
没有数据

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和 AMD Radeon E6760 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.0
4.6
OpenGL
4.3

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 和 AMD Radeon E6760 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 查明是否 AMD Radeon E6760 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon E6760
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon E6760
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon E6760
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon E6760
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon E6760
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GRID K260Q

9.1% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (1536 vs 480)

大的内存带宽 (28 nm vs 40 nm)

最大的RAM尺寸 (2 GB vs 1 GB)

大的内存带宽 (160.0 GB/s vs 51.2 GB/s)

优势 AMD Radeon E6760

更少的电力消耗 (45 Watt vs 225 Watt)

So, NVIDIA GRID K260Q or AMD Radeon E6760?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GRID K260Q .

NVIDIA GRID K260Q versus AMD Radeon E6760 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score