NVIDIA GeForce 810M
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA GeForce 810M
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定NVIDIA GeForce 810M和NVIDIA GRID K260Q之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

917
业绩排名中的位置
379
Fermi 2.0
建筑学
Kepler
GF117
代码名称
GK104
Desktop
类型
Workstation
24 March 2014 (7 years ago)
发布日期
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
没有数据
初始价格
$937
$163
当前价格
没有数据
0.20
物有所值
没有数据
GF117
图形处理器的代码名称
GK104
Desktop
市场部分
Workstation

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,NVIDIA GeForce 810M 与 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

48
输送机
1536
738 MHz
核心时钟频率
745 MHz
950 MHz
加速
没有数据
585 million
晶体管的数量
3,540 million
28 nm
技术过程
28 nm
15 Watt
消耗功率
225 Watt
5.904
每秒处理的文本数
95.36
141.7 gflops
浮点运算
2,289 gflops
48
转换器/CUDA核心
1536
950 MHz
加速速度
没有数据
585 million
晶体管的数量
3,540 million
15 Watt
设计热量输出
225 Watt

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GeForce 810M}和NVIDIA GRID K260Q}}}}}}的图形卡NVIDIA GeForce 810M}。

PCIe 2.0 x16
介面
PCIe 3.0 x16

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. NVIDIA GeForce 810M 和NVIDIA GRID K260Q 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

DDR3
存储器类型
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
存储器总线容量
256 Bit
1800 MHz
存储器频率
5000 MHz
14.4 GB/s
内存带宽
160.0 GB/s

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡NVIDIA GeForce 810M和NVIDIA GRID K260Q的图形卡NVIDIA GeForce 810M。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
No outputs

API 支持

两个对手 NVIDIA GeForce 810M 和 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 NVIDIA GeForce 810M 和 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 NVIDIA GeForce 810M 查明是否 NVIDIA GRID K260Q 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 NVIDIA GeForce 810M

更少的电力消耗 (15 Watt vs 225 Watt)

优势 NVIDIA GRID K260Q

11.57% 在测试中更快

更多输送机 (1536 vs 48)

最大的RAM尺寸 (2 GB vs 1 GB)

大的内存带宽 (160.0 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 810M or NVIDIA GRID K260Q?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GRID K260Q .

NVIDIA GeForce 810M versus NVIDIA GRID K260Q 基准测试中的比较

基准中的整体表现

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

2.2 Out of 39 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score