Mobility Radeon X1700
VS
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Mobility Radeon X1700
VS
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200

一般信息

显卡比较列表中的一般信息部分包含发布日期、类型、总体评级和其他有用的数据,以确定Mobility Radeon X1700和NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200之间的胜负。请注意,比较是全面的,下面是来自合成基准的排名,定义了游戏和工作应用中的不同标准。

not rated
业绩排名中的位置
not rated
R500
建筑学
Kelvin
1 February 2006 (15 years ago)
发布日期
6 February 2002 (19 years ago)
M66-P
图形处理器的代码名称
NV25 A2
Laptop
市场部分
Desktop

技术数据

在制造工艺、功耗、基础和涡轮增压GPU频率方面,Mobility Radeon X1700 与 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 相比,哪个显卡更好,是显卡排名中包含的最重要部分。
 

5 MHz
核心时钟频率
250 MHz
90 nm
技术过程
150 nm
1.900
每秒处理的文本数
2.000
17
转换器/CUDA核心
没有数据
475 MHz
加速速度
没有数据
157 million
晶体管的数量
63 million

尺寸、连接器和兼容性

让我们讨论图形卡Mobility Radeon X1700}和NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200}}}}}}的图形卡Mobility Radeon X1700}。

PCIe 1.0 x16
介面
AGP 4x
没有数据
补充喂养
None
medium sized
Laptop size
没有数据

内存(频率和超频)

显卡内存在游戏和图形应用中都发挥着重要作用。标准越高(GDDR)越好。它对速度和处理效率有直接影响. Mobility Radeon X1700 和NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 之间在类型、基础和涡轮频率、GDDR带宽方面有什么区别:

DDR/DDR2/GDDR3/GDDR4
存储器类型
DDR
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
64 MB
128 Bit
存储器总线容量
64 Bit
800 MHz
存储器频率
500 MHz
12.8 GB/s
内存带宽
4 GB/s
-
共享内存
没有数据

支持端口和显示器

让我们讨论图形卡Mobility Radeon X1700和NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200的图形卡Mobility Radeon X1700。

No outputs
与显示器的连接
1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API 支持

两个对手 Mobility Radeon X1700 和 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 之间的战斗即将结束。硬件支持(API)对整体性能影响不大,它在合成基准和其他性能测试中没有被计算在内。

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
没有数据
2.0
OpenGL
没有数据
N/A
Vulkan
没有数据
3.0
Shader Model
没有数据
N/A
OpenCL
没有数据

游戏中的表现

选择列表以识别 Mobility Radeon X1700 和 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 图形卡. 结果显示游戏将运行的速度以及是否可以在此计算机上运行。不同的监视器分辨率(从低到4K)用于测试。 找出是 Mobility Radeon X1700 查明是否 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 适合游戏的


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Mobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Death Stranding (2020) Mobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
F1 2020 (2020) Mobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Gears Tactics (2020) Mobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Doom Eternal (2020) Mobility Radeon X1700
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

优势 Mobility Radeon X1700

大的内存带宽 (90 nm vs 150 nm)

最大的RAM尺寸 (256 MB vs 64 MB)

大的内存带宽 (12.8 GB/s vs 4 GB/s)

优势 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200

6% 在测试中更快

So, Mobility Radeon X1700 or NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200?

根据合成和游戏测试的结果,我们建议 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 .

Mobility Radeon X1700 versus NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 基准测试中的比较

Passmark

基准测试Passmark。图形卡性能测试结果。在hitesti.com上查看GPU的Passmark测试结果。

用户评价

3.7 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
4.1 Out of 16 Hitesti Score