Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
VS
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
VS
ATI Radeon HD 3850

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Radeon X1650 PRO AGP  vs  ATI Radeon HD 3850.

not rated
Place in performance rating
907
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
no data
Code name
RV670
no data
Type
Desktop
15 October 2006 (15 years ago)
Release date
19 November 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$179
$200
Price now
$30 (0.2x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.37
RV535
GPU code name
RV670
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Radeon X1650 PRO AGP  vs  ATI Radeon HD 3850 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
320
600 MHz
Core clock speed
668 MHz
no data
Transistor count
666 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
2.400
Texture fill rate
10.69
no data
Floating-point performance
427.5 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
330 million
Number of transistors
666 million
44 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Radeon X1650 PRO AGP and ATI Radeon HD 3850 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

AGP 8x
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
208 mm
1x Molex
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Radeon X1650 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 3850.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1400 MHz
Memory clock speed
1660 MHz
22.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
53.12 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Radeon X1650 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 3850.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Radeon X1650 PRO AGP and ATI Radeon HD 3850 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
Vulkan
no data
3.0
Shader Model
no data
N/A
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Radeon X1650 PRO AGP and ATI Radeon HD 3850 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Radeon X1650 PRO AGP or ATI Radeon HD 3850 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Death Stranding (2020) Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
ATI Radeon HD 3850
F1 2020 (2020) Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Gears Tactics (2020) Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Doom Eternal (2020) Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Radeon X1650 PRO AGP

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 3850

3.16% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($30 (0.2x MSRP) vs $200)

Finer manufacturing process technology (55 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (53.12 GB/s vs 22.4 GB/s)

So, Radeon X1650 PRO AGP or ATI Radeon HD 3850?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon HD 3850 .

Radeon X1650 PRO AGP versus ATI Radeon HD 3850 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.0 Out of 6 Hitesti Score
4.4 Out of 39 Hitesti Score