NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2050

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285  vs  NVIDIA Tesla C2050.

not rated
Place in performance rating
331
1.41
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Curie
Architecture
Fermi
NV44 A2
Code name
GF100
Workstation
Type
Workstation
6 June 2006 (15 years ago)
Release date
25 July 2011 (10 years ago)
$27.99
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$63 (2.3x MSRP)
Price now
$200
no data
Value for money
7.09
NV44 A2
GPU code name
GF100
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285  vs  NVIDIA Tesla C2050 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
448
275 MHz
Core clock speed
574 MHz
75 million
Transistor count
3,100 million
110 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
18 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
238 Watt
1.100
Texture fill rate
32.14
no data
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
448
75 million
Number of transistors
3,100 million
18 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
238 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
168 mm
Length
248 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050.

DDR
Memory type
GDDR5
128 MB
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
500 MHz
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
144.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050.

1x DMS-59
Display Connectors
1x DVI

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 or NVIDIA Tesla C2050 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285

Cheaper ($63 (2.3x MSRP) vs $200)

Less power consumption (18 Watt vs 238 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (128 MB vs 3 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla C2050

16.12% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 110 nm)

More memory bandwidth (144.0 GB/s vs 8 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 or NVIDIA Tesla C2050?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Tesla C2050 .

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 versus NVIDIA Tesla C2050 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score