NVIDIA Tesla C2050
VS
AMD FirePro W8000
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
VS
AMD FirePro W8000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Tesla C2050  vs  AMD FirePro W8000.

331
Place in performance rating
338
no data
Value for money (0-100)
6.98
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GF100
Code name
Tahiti
Workstation
Type
Desktop
25 July 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
14 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,599
$200
Price now
$550 (0.3x MSRP)
7.09
Value for money
2.49
GF100
GPU code name
Tahiti
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Tesla C2050  vs  AMD FirePro W8000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

448
Pipelines
1792
574 MHz
Core clock speed
900 MHz
3,100 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
238 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
32.14
Texture fill rate
100.8
1,030.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
448
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1792
3,100 million
Number of transistors
4,313 million
238 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
350 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and AMD FirePro W8000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
248 mm
Length
279 mm
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD FirePro W8000.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
3000 MHz
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
144.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
176 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD FirePro W8000.

1x DVI
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and AMD FirePro W8000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and AMD FirePro W8000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Tesla C2050 or AMD FirePro W8000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2050
AMD FirePro W8000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2050
AMD FirePro W8000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2050
AMD FirePro W8000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2050
AMD FirePro W8000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Tesla C2050
AMD FirePro W8000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla C2050

0.29% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($200 vs $550 (0.3x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD FirePro W8000

More pipelines (1792 vs 448)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (225 Watt vs 238 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 3 GB)

More memory bandwidth (176 GB/s vs 144.0 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Tesla C2050 or AMD FirePro W8000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Tesla C2050 .

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 versus AMD FirePro W8000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score