NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M  vs  AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

855
Place in performance rating
504
0.66
Value for money (0-100)
13.64
G9x
Architecture
Polaris
G92
Code name
Lexa
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
14 August 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
21 March 2018 (3 years ago)
$925
Launch price (MSRP)
$149
$163 (0.2x MSRP)
Price now
$343 (2.3x MSRP)
0.13
Value for money
6.49
NB9E-GLM3
GPU code name
Polaris 12
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M  vs  AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

128
Pipelines
512
550 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
754 million
Transistor count
2,200 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
35.20
Texture fill rate
39.01
352.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
128
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
no data
Boost clock speed
1219 MHz
754 million
Number of transistors
2,200 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
51.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
CUDA
no data
no data
FreeSync
+
no data
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
+
+
PowerMizer 8.0
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Cheaper ($163 (0.2x MSRP) vs $343 (2.3x MSRP))

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 48 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

4.74% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (512 vs 128)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 65 nm)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
4.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score