AMD Caicos
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
AMD Caicos
VS
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Caicos  vs  AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

not rated
Place in performance rating
504
no data
Value for money (0-100)
13.64
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Polaris
Caicos
Code name
Lexa
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
21 March 2018 (3 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$149
$10.38
Price now
$343 (2.3x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
6.49
Caicos
GPU code name
Polaris 12
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Caicos  vs  AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

160
Pipelines
512
no data
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
2,200 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
39.01
no data
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
no data
Boost clock speed
1219 MHz
370 million
Number of transistors
2,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
35 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Caicos vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Caicos vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
FreeSync
+
no data
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $343 (2.3x MSRP))

Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

8.23% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (512 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Caicos or AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 .

AMD Caicos versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score
4.5 Out of 2 Hitesti Score