General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Matrox Parhelia 128 MB.
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Matrox Parhelia 128 MB in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Matrox Parhelia 128 MB.
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Matrox Parhelia 128 MB.
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M or Matrox Parhelia 128 MB good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | ||||||
| Matrox Parhelia 128 MB | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | ||||||
| Matrox Parhelia 128 MB | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | ||||||
| Matrox Parhelia 128 MB | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | ||||||
| Matrox Parhelia 128 MB | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M | ||||||
| Matrox Parhelia 128 MB | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps |
| May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected. | |
| 30 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps |
| 40 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps |
| 60 | Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps |
| May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected. | |
| ? | Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family. | |
| The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results. | |
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
2% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($69 vs $125)
Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 150 nm)
More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 128 MB)
More memory bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 16 GB/s)
Advantages of Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M or Matrox Parhelia 128 MB?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M .
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M versus Matrox Parhelia 128 MB performance benchmarks comparison
Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com
User rating
