NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
VS
Mach64
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
VS
Mach64

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M  vs  Mach64.

1048
Place in performance rating
not rated
G9x
Architecture
Mach
1 October 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
no data
$69
Price now
$163
0.07
Value for money
no data
NB9P-GLM
GPU code name
Mach64
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M  vs  Mach64 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

625 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
600 nm
10.00
Texture fill rate
no data
99.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
314 million
Number of transistors
1 million
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and Mach64 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-II
Interface
no data
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Mach64.

GDDR3
Memory type
no data
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs Mach64.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and Mach64 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
N/A
no data
OpenGL
N/A
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M and Mach64 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M or Mach64 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Mach64
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Mach64
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Mach64
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Mach64
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Mach64
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

2% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($69 vs $163)

Finer manufacturing process technology (65 nm vs 600 nm)

Advantages of Mach64

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M or Mach64?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M versus Mach64 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score