NVIDIA GeForce 320M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA GeForce 320M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce 320M  vs  NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295.

1031
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
1.56
GT2xx
Architecture
Tesla
C89
Code name
G98
Laptop
Type
Workstation
1 April 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
7 May 2009 (12 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$54.50
$408
Price now
$45 (0.8x MSRP)
MCP89
GPU code name
G98
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce 320M  vs  NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

48
Pipelines
8
450 MHz
Core clock speed
540 MHz
486 million
Transistor count
210 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
23 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
23 Watt
7.200
Texture fill rate
4.320
no data
Floating-point performance
20.8 gflops
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
8
486 million
Number of transistors
210 million
23 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
23 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295.

System Shared
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1390 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
11.12 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DisplayPort

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 320M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 320M or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 320M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 320M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 320M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 320M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 320M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 320M

0.87% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (48 vs 8)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Cheaper ($45 (0.8x MSRP) vs $408)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 320M or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce 320M .

NVIDIA GeForce 320M versus NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.0 Out of 10 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score