NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GRID K260Q  vs  NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295.

379
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
1.56
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
GK104
Code name
G98
Workstation
Type
Workstation
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
7 May 2009 (12 years ago)
$937
Launch price (MSRP)
$54.50
no data
Price now
$45 (0.8x MSRP)
GK104
GPU code name
G98
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GRID K260Q  vs  NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1536
Pipelines
8
745 MHz
Core clock speed
540 MHz
3,540 million
Transistor count
210 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
225 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
23 Watt
95.36
Texture fill rate
4.320
2,289 gflops
Floating-point performance
20.8 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
8
3,540 million
Number of transistors
210 million
225 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
23 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
168 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1390 MHz
160.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
11.12 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DisplayPort

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GRID K260Q or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID K260Q

13.23% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1536 vs 8)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 65 nm)

More memory bandwidth (160.0 GB/s vs 11.12 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Less power consumption (23 Watt vs 225 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA GRID K260Q or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GRID K260Q .

NVIDIA GRID K260Q versus NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score