Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
VS
FirePro M8900
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
VS
FirePro M8900

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7  vs  FirePro M8900.

321
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Architecture
Terascale 2
15 August 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
12 April 2011 (10 years ago)
no data
Price now
$267
Tiger Lake Xe
GPU code name
Blackcomb XT
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7  vs  FirePro M8900 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Core clock speed
680 MHz
10 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
32.64
no data
Floating-point performance
1,305.6 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
960
no data
Number of transistors
1,700 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 and FirePro M8900 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large
no data
Bus support
n/a
no data
Form factor
MXM-B

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs FirePro M8900.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
115 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs FirePro M8900.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 and FirePro M8900 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

no data
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
5.0
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 and FirePro M8900 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 or FirePro M8900 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
FirePro M8900
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
FirePro M8900
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
FirePro M8900
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
FirePro M8900
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
FirePro M8900
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7

14.82% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (10 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of FirePro M8900

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 or FirePro M8900?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 .

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 versus FirePro M8900 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.7 Out of 388 Hitesti Score
3.8 Out of 4 Hitesti Score