GRID K200
VS
NVIDIA GRID K520
GRID K200
VS
NVIDIA GRID K520

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GRID K200  vs  NVIDIA GRID K520.

not rated
Place in performance rating
358
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
no data
Code name
GK104
no data
Type
Workstation
28 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
23 July 2013 (8 years ago)
$235
Launch price (MSRP)
$3,599
no data
Price now
$750 (0.2x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
1.54
GK104
GPU code name
GK104
Workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GRID K200  vs  NVIDIA GRID K520 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
1536
745 MHz
Core clock speed
745 MHz
no data
Transistor count
3,540 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
95.36
Texture fill rate
95.36
2,289 gflops
Floating-point performance
2x 2,448 gflops
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1536
3,540 million
Number of transistors
3,540 million
225 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
225 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GRID K200 and NVIDIA GRID K520 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GRID K200 vs NVIDIA GRID K520.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
160.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GRID K200 vs NVIDIA GRID K520.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

3.0
CUDA
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GRID K200 and NVIDIA GRID K520 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GRID K200 and NVIDIA GRID K520 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GRID K200 or NVIDIA GRID K520 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GRID K200
NVIDIA GRID K520
Death Stranding (2020) GRID K200
NVIDIA GRID K520
F1 2020 (2020) GRID K200
NVIDIA GRID K520
Gears Tactics (2020) GRID K200
NVIDIA GRID K520
Doom Eternal (2020) GRID K200
NVIDIA GRID K520
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GRID K200

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GRID K520

15.71% faster in synthetic tests

So, GRID K200 or NVIDIA GRID K520?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GRID K520 .

GRID K200 versus NVIDIA GRID K520 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

Octane Render OctaneBench

Benchmark Octane Render OctaneBench: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Octane Render OctaneBench test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score
5.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score