GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M260
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M260

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216  vs  AMD Radeon R7 M260.

not rated
Place in performance rating
890
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.62
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN
no data
Code name
Topaz
no data
Type
Laptop
16 September 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$299
Launch price (MSRP)
$799
$260 (0.9x MSRP)
Price now
$430 (0.5x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.04
GT200
GPU code name
Opal Pro / Mars
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216  vs  AMD Radeon R7 M260 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

no data
Pipelines
384
576 MHz
Core clock speed
715 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
980 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,550 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
41.47
Texture fill rate
23.52
536.5 gflops
Floating-point performance
721.9 gflops
no data
Compute units
6
216
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Boost clock speed
980 MHz
1,400 million
Number of transistors
1,550 million
182 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
267 mm
Length
no data
2x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
896 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
448 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1998 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
111.9 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
32 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

1.3
CUDA
no data
no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
Zero Core
+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
3.3
OpenGL
4.3
N/A
Vulkan
no data
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 or AMD Radeon R7 M260 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 M260
Death Stranding (2020) GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 M260
F1 2020 (2020) GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 M260
Gears Tactics (2020) GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 M260
Doom Eternal (2020) GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 M260
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Cheaper ($260 (0.9x MSRP) vs $430 (0.5x MSRP))

More maximum RAM amount (896 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (111.9 GB/s vs 32 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M260

3.02% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 65 nm)

So, GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 or AMD Radeon R7 M260?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 M260 .

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 versus AMD Radeon R7 M260 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Unigine Heaven 3.0

Benchmark Unigine Heaven 3.0: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Unigine Heaven 3.0 test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

4.4 Out of 5 Hitesti Score
2.6 Out of 41 Hitesti Score