AMD Fiji
VS
AMD FirePro M2000
AMD Fiji
VS
AMD FirePro M2000

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Fiji  vs  AMD FirePro M2000.

not rated
Place in performance rating
915
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Terascale 2
Fiji
Code name
Turks
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
1 July 2012 (9 years ago)
$26
Price now
$387
no data
Value for money
0.03
Fiji
GPU code name
Turks GLM
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Fiji  vs  AMD FirePro M2000 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

4096
Pipelines
480
no data
Core clock speed
500 MHz
8,900 million
Transistor count
716 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
12.00
no data
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
4096
Pipelines / CUDA cores
480
8,900 million
Number of transistors
716 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Fiji and AMD FirePro M2000 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
n/a
no data
Form factor
chip-down

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Fiji vs AMD FirePro M2000.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Fiji vs AMD FirePro M2000.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
StereoOutput3D
1

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Fiji and AMD FirePro M2000 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Fiji and AMD FirePro M2000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Fiji or AMD FirePro M2000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Fiji
AMD FirePro M2000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Fiji
AMD FirePro M2000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Fiji
AMD FirePro M2000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Fiji
AMD FirePro M2000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Fiji
AMD FirePro M2000
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Fiji

Cheaper ($26 vs $387)

More pipelines (4096 vs 480)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M2000

0.58% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Fiji or AMD FirePro M2000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro M2000 .

AMD Fiji versus AMD FirePro M2000 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Vantage Performance

Benchmark 3DMark Vantage Performance: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Vantage Performance test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score
2.0 Out of 1 Hitesti Score