AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
AMD Fiji
AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
AMD Fiji

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Radeon R9 280  vs  AMD Fiji.

237
Place in performance rating
not rated
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Tahiti
Code name
Fiji
Desktop
Type
Desktop
4 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
no data
$279
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$305 (1.1x MSRP)
Price now
$26
reference
Design
no data
10.12
Value for money
no data
Tahiti
GPU code name
Fiji
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Radeon R9 280  vs  AMD Fiji in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

1792
Pipelines
4096
933 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
4,313 million
Transistor count
8,900 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
200 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
104.5
Texture fill rate
no data
3,344 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
933 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,313 million
Number of transistors
8,900 million
200 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Fiji come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
275 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Fiji.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
384 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1250 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
240 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Fiji.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data
1
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Fiji is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 280 and AMD Fiji graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 280 or AMD Fiji good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Fiji
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Fiji
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Fiji
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Fiji
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Fiji
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280

24.71% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD Fiji

Cheaper ($26 vs $305 (1.1x MSRP))

More pipelines (4096 vs 1792)

So, AMD Radeon R9 280 or AMD Fiji?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 280 .

AMD Radeon R9 280 versus AMD Fiji performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

3.5 Out of 30 Hitesti Score
3.3 Out of 3 Hitesti Score