AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

not rated
Place in performance rating
154
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
Cedar
Code name
TU106
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
$17.81
Price now
no data
Cedar
GPU code name
N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between AMD Cedar  vs  NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

80
Pipelines
2304
no data
Core clock speed
600 - 870 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
10,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
175.0
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1920
no data
Boost clock speed
1215 - 1380 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
10,800 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
60 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

no data
Memory type
GDDR6
no data
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
no data
Memory bus width
192 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What's the difference between AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
G-SYNC support
+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
CUDA
7.5

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 178.3 119.2 104.4 102.6 67.5 31.6
Legend
5 Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60 Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
? Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

42.34% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2304 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 40 nm)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Benchmark 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Score: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Score test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Benchmark 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Benchmark 3DMark 11 Performance GPU: Graphic cards performance test result. Check 3DMark 11 Performance GPU test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

Passmark

Benchmark Passmark: Graphic cards performance test result. Check Passmark test results of GPUs on hitesti.com

User rating

5.0 Out of 2 Hitesti Score
0.0 Out of 0 Hitesti Score